The Bar Council of India (BCI) has recently reiterated and strengthened its stance on legal advertising and solicitation, emphasizing the ethical boundaries that advocates must adhere to in India. As per the latest updates, particularly highlighted in statements and actions taken in 2024 and early 2025, the BCI continues to enforce strict prohibitions on advertising and solicitation by legal professionals, rooted in the Advocates Act, 1961, and the Bar Council of India Rules.




Key Guidelines from the Bar Council of India:
The BCI's position is primarily governed by Rule 36, Chapter II, Part VI of the Bar Council of India Rules, which explicitly prohibits advocates from soliciting work or advertising their services, either directly or indirectly. The latest statements and directives reflect a response to the growing use of digital platforms, including social media, and the involvement of celebrities or influencers in promoting legal services. Here’s a breakdown of the guidelines and the BCI’s latest stance:
  1. Prohibition on Advertising and Solicitation:
    • Advocates are barred from soliciting work or advertising through any means, including circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communications, interviews (unless warranted by personal relations), or publishing content like photographs tied to cases they are involved in.
    • This includes a complete ban on using social media platforms (such as Instagram, Twitter, or others) to directly or indirectly promote legal services or solicit clients.
  2. Digital Platform Restrictions:
    • The BCI has explicitly condemned the use of online platforms for advertising legal services. This includes promotional videos, social media posts, or listings on websites like Quikr, Sulekha, or Just Dial, which facilitate lawyer-client connections in ways deemed unethical.
    • A 2008 amendment to Rule 36 allows advocates to furnish limited website information (e.g., name, address, qualifications, areas of practice) only with prior approval from the BCI. Any additional content beyond this approved scope is considered a violation.
  3. Ban on Celebrity and Influencer Endorsements:
    • The BCI’s latest statements, notably from March 17, 2025, criticize the use of Bollywood actors, celebrities, or influencers to endorse or promote legal services. Such practices are seen as commercializing the profession, which the BCI views as a noble service rather than a business.
  4. Ethical Conduct and Professional Integrity:
    • The BCI emphasizes that the legal profession is rooted in public trust, justice, and fairness. Advertising or solicitation is believed to erode this trust and diminish the dignity of the profession.
    • Advocates leveraging religious, cultural, or public events for self-promotion (e.g., via banners or digital ads) are also in violation of these ethical standards.
  5. Consequences of Violation:
    • Violators face severe disciplinary actions under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, which addresses professional misconduct. Penalties may include suspension or cancellation of enrollment, referral to the Supreme Court for contempt proceedings, and mandates to remove offending content.
    • The BCI has directed State Bar Councils to initiate disciplinary proceedings against advocates found breaching these rules and has issued cease-and-desist notices to online platforms facilitating such activities.
  6. Response to Digital Age Challenges:
    • Following a Madras High Court ruling on July 3, 2024, the BCI issued directives on July 8, 2024, reinforcing its crackdown on online solicitation. The court underscored that legal practice is not a profit-driven business, and online platforms enabling advertising violate Rule 36.
    • Digital platforms are now required to establish vetting mechanisms to prevent misleading legal content and remove it promptly when identified.
Latest Statement (March 2025):
In its press release dated March 17, 2025, the BCI condemned the “unethical commercialization” of legal services, specifically targeting advocates using social media, promotional videos, and influencers. It reiterated the Supreme Court’s stance (e.g., in Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji, 2018) that the legal profession is a service to society, not a commercial venture. The BCI warned that any deviation from these mandates would attract strict penalties, urging advocates and digital platforms to comply to preserve the profession’s integrity.

Specific to Instagram:
While the BCI does not single out Instagram in its rules, the platform falls under the broader prohibition on social media use for advertising or solicitation. Posting promotional content, such as reels or stories showcasing legal services, would be a clear violation of Rule 36, as it constitutes indirect solicitation. For example, the controversy surrounding DSK Legal’s Instagram reel featuring Rahul Bose in early 2025 prompted sharp criticism and reinforced the BCI’s crackdown.
In summary, the Bar[contains truncated content]Council of India’s latest guidelines and statements reaffirm a zero-tolerance policy toward legal advertising and solicitation, extending this prohibition to all digital platforms, including Instagram. Advocates must refrain from any promotional activities beyond the limited, BCI-approved website information to avoid disciplinary action.

Citations

_______________
©Abhinav Chandra. Weekly-Newsletters. Any unauthorized use, circulation, or reproduction shall attract suitable action under applicable law.